Episode 5

full
Published on:

21st Mar 2025

The Abusive System You’ve Never Heard Of: Exposing How Family Courts Fail Survivors of Domestic Abuse

"You can feel like you’ve moved on, but years later, an abuser can drag you back into the system, and you have no choice but to fight." – Lara

Welcome back to wo0 pod, the unapologetic space where women refuse to be told what to wear or how to run their businesses. Hosted by Wendy Gannon (aka Wo0), this podcast is part of Female Five Million—a movement dedicated to empowering women to take control, own their space, and push back against the systems that seek to silence them.

In this powerful and deeply personal episode, Wendy is joined by Lara, an executive coach, mother, and survivor of domestic abuse and the UK family court system. Lara shares her three-year battle fighting for her children in a system that too often protects abusers and punishes victims. Lara has asked that we protect her privacy by sharing only her first name. We kindly ask that if you know Lara personally you respect her right to request that her story as an example of the flawed UK family court system remain the focus of this episode, not Lara personally. 

This episode is absolutely crucial for any woman (or anyone supporting a woman) navigating family court, coercive control, or systemic injustice, as well as for anyone who wants to understand the shocking reality behind closed doors.

In This Episode - Lara & wo0 Discuss:

  • The reality of family court – How the system is built to protect abusers, not victims
  • Why women lose custody of their children – The shocking legal loopholes that leave mothers powerless
  • The emotional and financial toll of fighting for your children – How the legal system is designed to wear women down
  • The role of domestic abuse advocates – Why support networks are crucial for survival
  • How family courts silence victims – Why cases are kept private and why that needs to change
  • Breaking free and rebuilding life after court – Lara’s journey from survival to thriving
  • Blowing up the system – Why reforming family courts should be on everyone’s radar

About Lara:

Lara is an executive coach, speaker, and mother of three who spent three years fighting for justice - and to protect her children - in the family court system. After enduring both domestic abuse and legal abuse, she is now sharing her story to advocate for systemic change and greater support for women navigating these battles. Lara has asked that we protect her privacy by sharing only her first name. 

Resources & Support for Women in Family Court:

We know this episode covers deeply personal and challenging topics. If you or someone you know is navigating domestic abuse or family court, these organisations can help:

Connect with wo0:

Work with wo0:

This is a Decibelle Creative original podcast 

How To Support This Podcast

Imagine missing an episode of this podcast because you haven’t subscribed?! Don’t do it to yourself… 

🎧 Hit ‘Follow’ or ‘Subscribe’ so you never miss an episode— tell the algorithm this podcast deserves to be heard!

Leave a rating & review to boost the show's ranking and help others discover it. We love to hear what resonates with you and your favourite episode highlights. 

📢 Share this episode with friends, colleagues, or on social media—word of mouth is one of the most powerful tools for independent podcasters!

A quick word from the host & producer…

“We get it - podcasters bang on about subscribing, ratings and reviews all the time. But why bother? Well - because it genuinely makes a HUGE difference to shows like ours - shows that have been made with unbelievable amounts of love, intention and hard work, usually without the help of big advertising budgets… 

Podcast platforms use algorithms to recommend shows to new listeners, meaning the more people who follow, rate, and review a podcast, the more likely it is to be featured in search results, charts, and recommendation lists. 

This all means that YOU have the power to help more people discover this podcast, and help passionate, independent podcasters like us continue doing what we love, with just a few simple clicks. More people who might really need to hear these important conversations…

THANK YOU SO MUCH from the bottom of our hearts for listening and supporting this podcast.” - wo0 & Buckers.

Join the Female Five Million Movement

Dont F**king Tell Me What To Wear Or How To Run My Business’ on the wo0 pod is more than just a podcast—it’s part of a movement… 

Follow Female Five Million and get involved in the movement:

  1. Search ‘Female Five Million’ on Linkedin
  2. Instagram: @female.five.million
  3. Follow & support the project on Kickstarter
  4. Buy the Female Five Million Coffee Table Book! The second edition is in production and will be available to pre-order soon - make sure you’re subscribed to the wo0 Photography newsletter for updates!

Female Five Million is an unapologetic celebration of women who’ve faced male to female abuse, broken free, and are now thriving on their own terms. This is a story of empowerment and resilience against abuse and toxicity from men, in business and beyond. This is a multi-faceted project made up of two empowering photoshoots, conversations, research, exhibitions, art and a beautiful coffee table book. 

“This project is deeply personal to me because I’ve been there. I know what it’s like to suffer domestic, sexual, financial, mental abuse and general misogyny in the workplace and my private life. I’ve been there but I’ve also found the strength to rise above and overcome it. 

By speaking openly about my experiences, I’ve met so many incredible women who’ve faced similar challenges, yet they’ve come out the other side stronger, smarter, (more hilarious) and more determined than ever. 

We're not just survivors, we're f*cking queens, and our stories deserve to be told.” - Wendy Gannon, Female Five Million Founder.



Transcript
Speaker:

>> Wo0: Welcome to don't fucking Tell me what to wear or how to

Speaker:

run my business. This is the

Speaker:

Woopod.

Speaker:

>> Lara: A female police officer who had attended an

Speaker:

incident said no further action.

Speaker:

Lara would not have been attacked if she had not

Speaker:

attended the property.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: I'm your host, Wendy Gannon, but most people call me

Speaker:

Woo. I'm a photographer, adhder,

Speaker:

female advocate, and let's be honest, an all

Speaker:

round legend. Can you tell I didn't write this

Speaker:

script?

Speaker:

This podcast is part of Female5Million, a

Speaker:

movement founded to empower women to step the fuck up,

Speaker:

take control, and unapologetically own their

Speaker:

space. It all started

Speaker:

with some fucking Jebins LinkedIn post

Speaker:

spouting some sexist bullshit about how women should dress

Speaker:

to succeed in business. And you know what?

Speaker:

Stuff like that really fucks me

Speaker:

off. It really fucks me off.

Speaker:

So I posted about it and that post ignited

Speaker:

something bigger. A nationwide photography project,

Speaker:

a full blown fucking movement. And now this

Speaker:

podcast here on the Woopod.

Speaker:

We're raising the voices of women who refuse to be told what to

Speaker:

do. Women who are done playing by the rules and are now

Speaker:

saying, don't fucking tell me what to wear or how to run my

Speaker:

business. If you've ever been told to tone it down,

Speaker:

dress more appropriately or. Or run your business like a

Speaker:

man, fuck that.

Speaker:

Expect raw, unfiltered conversations with women

Speaker:

who have fought through sexism, abuse and

Speaker:

outdated patriarchal bullshit to build success on their terms.

Speaker:

all whilst wearing whatever the fuck they want.

Speaker:

Oh, and there's more swearing than our producer is willing to

Speaker:

beep out. Sorry, buckers. Speaking of

Speaker:

which, you'll probably hear me ask producer Bacchus to chime in

Speaker:

from time to time, because like I give a shit what

Speaker:

she says. We've both got adhd. We bounce well off each other.

Speaker:

Deal with it. We're here to

Speaker:

celebrate women doing business their way and shine a spotlight on

Speaker:

the incredible ways women are fighting back and lifting each other

Speaker:

up. Because, to be honest, that's what it's all about.

Speaker:

And for those who aren't able to speak up right now

Speaker:

for whatever reason. I see you.

Speaker:

Okay, let's crack on then.

Speaker:

Hi, everybody, and welcome back to the

Speaker:

Woopod, the Don't Tell Me what to Wear or

Speaker:

How to run my Business podcast series.

Speaker:

I am joined today by Lara

Speaker:

*censored* who I have known.

Speaker:

How long have we known each other?

Speaker:

>> Lara: Probably before I was too old to legally be

Speaker:

going into a nightclub, so quite.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: I love that. So it's been many, many years,

Speaker:

but we lost contact for A good few years and moved

Speaker:

recently, recently come back in each other's

Speaker:

lives. I wanted to talk to

Speaker:

Lara specifically on the podcast

Speaker:

because she's gone through bit of

Speaker:

a shitter, a bit of a shitter

Speaker:

with the public, with the family court

Speaker:

process, etc. So we

Speaker:

will be talking a little bit about that. Hi

Speaker:

Lara, do you want to introduce yourself a little

Speaker:

bit?

Speaker:

>> Lara: We'll do so yeah. Like I said, I've known Wendy

Speaker:

since I was a teenager, for some

Speaker:

time and I didn't know a huge amount of the Bartless

Speaker:

podcast. But Wendy asked me impromptu, I think

Speaker:

only last week and because it was Wendy, I said yes

Speaker:

and here we are. but in terms of, I guess myself, I'm

Speaker:

a mum, so I'm a mum of three. I've got two older

Speaker:

boys and a little three year old girl. So that was a

Speaker:

lockdown, decision that, you know, still working out how good a life

Speaker:

decision that was or not given the older

Speaker:

boys are now 16 and 13. I work

Speaker:

as an executive coach and that's after a ah,

Speaker:

20 year career in financial services.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: Thank you. so

Speaker:

talk to me a little bit about your

Speaker:

experiences with family

Speaker:

court and how you

Speaker:

got there, if that's all right.

Speaker:

>> Lara: Oh goodness. If I could, if I could easily tell

Speaker:

you how I, you

Speaker:

know we could be here for days.

Speaker:

But my experiences, so I

Speaker:

unfortunately as many people do have

Speaker:

experienced a very toxic and abusive

Speaker:

relationship and that was with an ex

Speaker:

partner, happens to be the father of my two eldest children

Speaker:

and somebody I met at quite a young age. So I was

Speaker:

only I believe Ah, 2021 when we

Speaker:

first had contact and we had a relatively long term

Speaker:

relationship. It produced two amazing children.

Speaker:

But unfortunately from very, very early on in that

Speaker:

relationship it turned incredibly toxic. And

Speaker:

I won't go into every detail. I'm sure people that have

Speaker:

been there sort of know how it can go. But

Speaker:

those that haven't, I describe it as, for anyone

Speaker:

that's lived through that, they really have seen experience felt like

Speaker:

ah, the depths of humanity and if you've

Speaker:

experienced that you've survived it, you've come out the other side.

Speaker:

There's probably very little you can't do. And I

Speaker:

thought that like, I thought that I had experienced the worst.

Speaker:

So one of the hardest things is leaving. I think the next

Speaker:

hardest thing is staying left from that.

Speaker:

And then I thought I was done and we had you know, probably

Speaker:

a chunk of time where we still needed to have a

Speaker:

level of contact because you know, Two, two children,

Speaker:

a result of our relationship. but I thought

Speaker:

I'd experienced the worst I could possibly experience.

Speaker:

And then I had the misfortune of

Speaker:

getting involved in the family court system. And that

Speaker:

unfortunately came six years past

Speaker:

separation. And I think this is a really important thing for

Speaker:

people to understand that you can feel like you're done,

Speaker:

you can feel like you have a completely new life and that you've

Speaker:

moved on. But six years post

Speaker:

separation I met my fabulous new partner who is the

Speaker:

father of, my little three year old. And

Speaker:

that created a reaction in my

Speaker:

ex partner which was. Made him double down on

Speaker:

some of the behaviours that he'd potentially sort of

Speaker:

in the past. so what came next was

Speaker:

completely out of the blue, you know, like one day

Speaker:

a family, court hearing going.

Speaker:

He has applied for full custody of your children.

Speaker:

And, you are now in this process and you

Speaker:

are in the process. And once that application

Speaker:

has been made, there is nothing you can do

Speaker:

to not be in the process. You don't get an option to

Speaker:

go. Nothing to see here. Not something our

Speaker:

family requires. If somebody makes an

Speaker:

application, you are in the process.

Speaker:

Myself and my family were in that process for

Speaker:

three years. Whoa. It

Speaker:

was through lockdown for parts of, was

Speaker:

through the entirety of my pregnancy with my

Speaker:

third child and it was for the first year of her

Speaker:

life. So I thought I had

Speaker:

experienced everything I could experience for, every.

Speaker:

Anybody that is going through the family court

Speaker:

system. My goodness. There isn't like a level of

Speaker:

like compassion, empathy I can't extend

Speaker:

because I can hand on heart, say it

Speaker:

is the most abusive

Speaker:

aspect of abuse I've ever experienced.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: Fuck. Like,

Speaker:

I can't even, like. So I was really, really,

Speaker:

really lucky that Emily's dad

Speaker:

kind of stepped back. Like there was never any of

Speaker:

that. he didn't, he just didn't

Speaker:

really care, to be honest. so I'm,

Speaker:

I can't even contemplate

Speaker:

what that was like. can you tell

Speaker:

me what the process is like? Was

Speaker:

it, was it the actual

Speaker:

court thing that was.

Speaker:

Or him while the court

Speaker:

was going on? Can you like give us a bit more detail? What was

Speaker:

the.

Speaker:

>> Lara: I've spent a lot of time really, you know, because I was in

Speaker:

it for so long and I spent a lot of time really thinking about

Speaker:

like, what is it like, what makes it so awful? Like, why is

Speaker:

this so horrendous? Why? And you end up down really awful

Speaker:

rabbit holes actually when you start to lift

Speaker:

the bonnet on it because you hear horror

Speaker:

stories you hear absolute horror stories

Speaker:

of abused women

Speaker:

who lose their children, you know, like, have no

Speaker:

contact with their children. And it's purely because

Speaker:

the system and process has worn them down.

Speaker:

And I've met some of those women, I've spoken to some

Speaker:

of those women, I've sat in support groups with some

Speaker:

of those women. And I always maintain that

Speaker:

from, you know, my perspective, there were so many

Speaker:

things going in my favour. And I don't mean this

Speaker:

in, an arrogant way. I mean it sort of as in,

Speaker:

I.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: Like, there's no arrogance. Like, you are

Speaker:

great.

Speaker:

>> Lara: You know, like, I. I had financial resources.

Speaker:

I was always, you know, like, employed and had

Speaker:

financial independence and resources. I

Speaker:

had a great partner, I have a great family, I have a great

Speaker:

support network. I'm well educated. So

Speaker:

a lot of the legal lingo and

Speaker:

the things that feel really exclusive and almost like,

Speaker:

impossible to navigate, it was still

Speaker:

really challenging. But I. I had the ability

Speaker:

to go. When they're saying that, what it actually

Speaker:

means is this.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: Wow.

Speaker:

>> Lara: It's very intimidating. And so if you think of

Speaker:

it, almost the flip side of that, yeah,

Speaker:

they were the resources I had. And there were

Speaker:

moments where literally, not just

Speaker:

figuratively, I had to scrape myself up off the

Speaker:

floor. So at, each one of those moments,

Speaker:

I sat there and almost the pep talk I gave myself

Speaker:

was, imagine if I didn't have these things.

Speaker:

imagine if I had nowhere to live.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: Imagine.

Speaker:

>> Lara: Imagine if I wasn't educated in the way I was. Imagine

Speaker:

if I didn't feel a sense of agency, where

Speaker:

I don't feel intimidated just because someone's got a job

Speaker:

title or they're in a supposed position of

Speaker:

power. When you get

Speaker:

a, quite frankly, abusive

Speaker:

letter from a lawyer saying, these

Speaker:

are things that we are applying for and these are things

Speaker:

that you have done and these are things that we are claiming

Speaker:

and we are, as part of this process,

Speaker:

telling you that. That 10 years of abuse

Speaker:

you experienced, for which, Wendy, there are

Speaker:

police reports, there are medical records, there are

Speaker:

financial statements, there are. You know, I could give you every

Speaker:

piece of documentation to any reasonable

Speaker:

human would go, wow, that happened.

Speaker:

But they're going, it didn't happen. You're a liar.

Speaker:

And the system is set up to allow

Speaker:

oxygen to be given to that. It is.

Speaker:

It's truly horrendous. And I just. And you get

Speaker:

access to a lot of stuff, right? So you get access to things

Speaker:

that you've maybe not even been privy to

Speaker:

in the past. So I got access to a

Speaker:

maternity record of mine. you know, so you

Speaker:

don't. You don't get your whole maternity fight unless you request

Speaker:

it at some point. I got access to a maternity record

Speaker:

of mine and I saw the midwife's notes that had been written in

Speaker:

there. And I saw the midwife's notes where

Speaker:

I remember, you know, about 30

Speaker:

minutes after having had a child, they'd made a

Speaker:

handwritten note going, Lara had

Speaker:

flagged on the system as a

Speaker:

victim of abuse. And I had a

Speaker:

conversation with her to see if she was safe to go home. And

Speaker:

my reaction had been, I don't want to talk about it like, I don't want to talk

Speaker:

about it like, I'm okay, I'm fine, I'm fine.

Speaker:

And, not because I was fine, but because

Speaker:

out of the blue, this question has been asked. And, you know, as you

Speaker:

will well know, Wendsey, you spend so much of your

Speaker:

life trying not to let anyone see it.

Speaker:

So the fact that somebody was asking me, I was like,

Speaker:

oh, my God, is everyone in this hospital aware? Does everyone

Speaker:

know? So, you know, my only reaction in that moment could

Speaker:

have been, no, no, nothing to see here. And

Speaker:

similarly, I had a police report that,

Speaker:

I'd never seen. I'd never seen the details of.

Speaker:

And a female police officer who had

Speaker:

attended an incident wrote up her report

Speaker:

and at the end of it, said, no further

Speaker:

action. And the reason there was no further action.

Speaker:

And this was a female police officer had

Speaker:

written, Lara would not have been attacked

Speaker:

if she had not attended the property.

Speaker:

And that was the reason that the police took no further action.

Speaker:

Lara would not have been attacked had she not attended the

Speaker:

property. So not only is that

Speaker:

wrong to levels I can't describe, if I was going to,

Speaker:

you know, your house, a public place. I

Speaker:

attended a property. I owned. I owned

Speaker:

the property. It was my house.

Speaker:

Sorry, it was. It was

Speaker:

my house. I purchased it. So if

Speaker:

you can imagine that the end

Speaker:

result of this process is the

Speaker:

most precious thing to you in the world,

Speaker:

and there is a risk that that may be taken

Speaker:

away from you. And, throughout, you have

Speaker:

to navigate professionals, paid

Speaker:

professionals with fancy job titles

Speaker:

and positions of power, telling you

Speaker:

that you're a liar, even in the face of all of that

Speaker:

information, it's really challenging to put

Speaker:

into words, just how horrendous

Speaker:

the system is. And it stays as bad as it

Speaker:

is because it's sealed, because it's secret.

Speaker:

You can't get access to it in the way that you

Speaker:

could a public court case, you know, like a criminal

Speaker:

case or tribunal. So no one's allowed to

Speaker:

attend, you know, so it's all behind closed

Speaker:

doors.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: Are you joking?

Speaker:

Okay, so, so much from that.

Speaker:

First of all, what

Speaker:

person who's being abused says, yes, I'm

Speaker:

being abused. Especially

Speaker:

when you've just had a child of the person who's abusing you

Speaker:

and you're about to go home with them. Like,

Speaker:

how they can take that? I know

Speaker:

somebody. I'm not going to mention any names. I love her

Speaker:

dearly. She had just come

Speaker:

out of an abusive

Speaker:

relationship, has a young girl

Speaker:

with the person who's abusing her

Speaker:

and he's trying to get access

Speaker:

and he was abusing both of them.

Speaker:

He. He was allowed to

Speaker:

have all of her medical records.

Speaker:

What the is that about? So he

Speaker:

can say,

Speaker:

oh, this person is now on

Speaker:

antidepressants, which a lot of people

Speaker:

are. And good, quite frankly, if it's helping

Speaker:

you. I am. I'm on high dose of

Speaker:

renal vaccine. Not afraid to say it, which is

Speaker:

actually helping people. But he can use that against

Speaker:

her. How is that allowed

Speaker:

when you've got report like

Speaker:

the harass. There's harassment, right. And they just keep

Speaker:

coming at you and wearing you down

Speaker:

and you've got nothing left and then they can take

Speaker:

what you've been.

Speaker:

>> Lara: Ah.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: I just. Sorry, I just can't, like, doc.

Speaker:

Doctors should not. You should not be able to access people's

Speaker:

medical records, especially not somebody that you are.

Speaker:

That has been abused. I can't even.

Speaker:

>> Lara: It's almost incomprehensible, isn't it? And

Speaker:

particularly when you have, experienced a

Speaker:

relationship of that nature and you understand the dynamics of

Speaker:

it and it's why, you know, I truly

Speaker:

described it. And it sounds, it sounds crazy,

Speaker:

but there were moments in the process where I said, you know,

Speaker:

at parts of the process I had legal support. And then at parts of the

Speaker:

process, I decided that I actually found it, bizarrely

Speaker:

less stressful to do it myself. Yeah. And I

Speaker:

remember speaking to, a legal advocate

Speaker:

and saying, I don't think you get it, but

Speaker:

I don't think you get, like, how bad this is. As

Speaker:

in, I would prefer to

Speaker:

go back to literally having someone punch me in the face

Speaker:

every day. Yeah, yeah, do this. But I

Speaker:

don't think you quite comprehend. And I think the

Speaker:

piece that I came out of, just so

Speaker:

disillusioned, and horrified and almost like

Speaker:

wanting to blow up the system over,

Speaker:

was people making a lot of money

Speaker:

out of this. You know, there are highly

Speaker:

paid lawyers, barristers, making a

Speaker:

Lot of money out of this system with some of

Speaker:

the most vulnerable people you could imagine.

Speaker:

And like I said, I was in a position where, don't get me wrong,

Speaker:

the financial implications were severe for me as

Speaker:

well. But it. I didn't need to sell my house. I could still

Speaker:

go on holiday. You know, I was in a really privileged position. so

Speaker:

there's like

Speaker:

0.5% that's in that position.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: So there's women out there who have

Speaker:

lived this abuse

Speaker:

and have literally done nothing

Speaker:

wrong, probably nothing, but try and please the

Speaker:

person who's abusing them. they've

Speaker:

got something wonderful out of that

Speaker:

abuse. They're. They're beautiful

Speaker:

children and

Speaker:

they're like,

Speaker:

I'm so sorry, I can't. I can't. Like, I'm just.

Speaker:

I just want to cry, honestly.

Speaker:

>> Lara: And you. You speak to any, one. There are some

Speaker:

positive shoots, right? So if you can imagine

Speaker:

some of the phenomenal work that domestic abuse

Speaker:

charities do and things of that nature, there were a lot

Speaker:

of, domestic abuse advocates that will

Speaker:

be supporting women right through the process. So they're

Speaker:

not legally trained, they're not legal representatives, but they're there

Speaker:

from, you know, almost, you know, like emotional support and

Speaker:

helping them navigate, you know, what they're going through.

Speaker:

And if you speak to any one of those, anyone that

Speaker:

has ever supported a woman like, going through this,

Speaker:

I would say that there is a really consistent

Speaker:

story you will hear. And that really consistent

Speaker:

story is that many of the other

Speaker:

trained professionals in the system do not

Speaker:

understand the dynamics, the

Speaker:

signs, how abuse manifests, and it

Speaker:

therefore ties these poor women up

Speaker:

like a pretzel, you know, like, as in they don't know whether they're coming or

Speaker:

going. So a really repeated story

Speaker:

is when you're going through something like

Speaker:

this, you keep the child at the centre of it.

Speaker:

And how the court might observe you keeping

Speaker:

the child at the centre of it is going, former

Speaker:

abusive partner, who. I fear being

Speaker:

around my children because I know what you're capable

Speaker:

of. I will demonstrate that I

Speaker:

can be superhuman, not be

Speaker:

triggered, not be scared, not be afraid of you in any way

Speaker:

that I can communicate to you normally that I will share care with

Speaker:

you, that I will happily encourage my children to go and

Speaker:

spend a week with you. And if you don't do

Speaker:

that, what you're accused of is parental

Speaker:

alienation. So if you go, I am protecting

Speaker:

my child because they are, unsafe. you're accused of

Speaker:

parental alienation if you

Speaker:

do do it, you know, so I've heard a story

Speaker:

from the same woman who took that approach

Speaker:

of, I am so fearful of this person, I

Speaker:

will not allow my child to be in their presence. They got accused of

Speaker:

parental alienation. They got threatened with

Speaker:

losing custody of their child if they continued.

Speaker:

So they did attempt to work on some form

Speaker:

of shared care arrangement. And then they got accused of putting

Speaker:

their child at risk.

Speaker:

And it is that shambolic.

Speaker:

You know, it sounds like I'm almost sharing

Speaker:

a, you know, like a work of fiction, but

Speaker:

it is that shambolic. And the stories are repeated

Speaker:

again and again and again and again. And

Speaker:

unfortunately, because of so many of the other, like,

Speaker:

systemic issues in our society, there

Speaker:

are more judges that are mental. There are more men

Speaker:

that have access to financial resources to pay

Speaker:

for legal professionals in court. And if

Speaker:

a man says they want to see their children, they're

Speaker:

treated like a freaking hero. So the whole system

Speaker:

goes, what an awesome human.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: As a man.

Speaker:

>> Lara: And there is an assumption that, you know,

Speaker:

I am, I'm not just degree educated. I've got five

Speaker:

freaking degrees. And the reason I say that is

Speaker:

because even somebody as educated as me

Speaker:

in the System and a PhD executive

Speaker:

level in financial services, but even

Speaker:

somebody with that profile, that demographic,

Speaker:

I was portrayed as this caricature of

Speaker:

this hysterical, irrational,

Speaker:

unreasonable partner who was in

Speaker:

conflict with someone who was entirely

Speaker:

reasonable.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: Okay, I'm so

Speaker:

sorry that that happened to you, and I'm so sorry to

Speaker:

anybody else that that's happened to. It sounds

Speaker:

like a lot of people. And when you

Speaker:

said earlier, that women have lost

Speaker:

their children because they just couldn't do it.

Speaker:

It's just heartbreaking.

Speaker:

What can we do?

Speaker:

>> Lara: I think it starts from, this is the first

Speaker:

time I have publicly spoken about it. And I have to

Speaker:

be very sensitive as to, like, how,

Speaker:

because of the system is

Speaker:

private, it's sealed, it goes on behind

Speaker:

closed doors. I, also have to be

Speaker:

really sensitive because it's not just my story, but like, it

Speaker:

impacts children, it impacts other people. And

Speaker:

I think that's, that's part of the battle that, you know, like, the system is

Speaker:

set up in a way where it's

Speaker:

almost, it's not, it's not spoken

Speaker:

about, it's not reported. People don't understand the stories. You

Speaker:

know, like once in a blue moon, you will see an

Speaker:

expose in a newspaper, you know, or you will

Speaker:

see maybe a short documentary that's exploring

Speaker:

the system. But I really think it starts from talking about

Speaker:

it. I, really think it's then

Speaker:

about helping people to like, advocate you know, so

Speaker:

one of the things that I feel really passionately about

Speaker:

is that the, the legal system is

Speaker:

intentionally exclusive. And it's

Speaker:

intentionally exclusive because people profit from it being

Speaker:

exclusive. Yeah, you can't understand a

Speaker:

form if you don't know how to fill it in.

Speaker:

Then you need to pay someone to do it for you. And I

Speaker:

think if there was one change that needed to

Speaker:

be made, it's the accessibility of the

Speaker:

process. You shouldn't need to be a trained legal

Speaker:

professional to have a grown up

Speaker:

conversation about the outcomes for

Speaker:

your children. You shouldn't need to

Speaker:

pay somebody to understand the implications of what

Speaker:

form you're filling in, what you're saying in court,

Speaker:

what words the judge is using, and if you understand

Speaker:

what you're saying yes to or no to. So I'll give you a

Speaker:

really, really practical example of that.

Speaker:

Ah, There are many points

Speaker:

I've since learned, unfortunately in a legal

Speaker:

proceeding that ideally

Speaker:

judges don't like to make the decision. Like

Speaker:

ideally they like both parties to come to a

Speaker:

conc or something because ultimately that

Speaker:

minimises risk for them. Right, like, so if you and I have a

Speaker:

dispute and we agree and we get to a

Speaker:

consensus, the judge doesn't have to make a ruling.

Speaker:

And if the judge doesn't have to make a ruling, no one at any

Speaker:

point in time can ever say they are wrong or they got it

Speaker:

wrong. Never be challenged. So

Speaker:

when you understand that dynamic, what you then observe

Speaker:

over time, particularly if you're a litigant in person,

Speaker:

which is the term used for someone representing

Speaker:

themselves, is that legal professionals

Speaker:

on the other side will speak to you in a way,

Speaker:

will communicate to you in a way that almost backs

Speaker:

you in this corner to go, yes, I agree. Because once

Speaker:

you've agreed it goes to court and what happens is

Speaker:

we've reached consensus on this topic and it never needs

Speaker:

to be, you know, it never needs to be opined upon by a

Speaker:

judge. A ruling doesn't need to be made. And I had a couple

Speaker:

of moments where I still had legal representation

Speaker:

in place. And even with, like I said, not

Speaker:

necessarily being intimidated by authority, being

Speaker:

relatively well educated, being able to understand things

Speaker:

as they came in, I had a couple of moments where I said to my legal

Speaker:

representative, do I have to do that? Like, do I have to say

Speaker:

yes? And she was like, oh God no, no, you can contest

Speaker:

it. And if you can test that position, then it needs to go to

Speaker:

a hearing. And I'm like, right, but it's

Speaker:

just a tiny example of

Speaker:

how, legal professionals in that system,

Speaker:

I personally believe not all, but quite

Speaker:

frankly there is scope for people to abuse

Speaker:

their position of power and they can abuse it with

Speaker:

very, very vulnerable people and at the end of the

Speaker:

day they pick up a paycheck for doing so.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: I'm just thinking about how I would cope in that

Speaker:

situation. As somebody who's

Speaker:

neurodivergent, if somebody would ask me something

Speaker:

like that, I'd automatically just say yes and not understand

Speaker:

and not say that I don't understand and just go along with

Speaker:

it so that.

Speaker:

>> Lara: They don't just ask. Imagine as well. So they don't just as a

Speaker:

reasonable human go, Wendy, I was

Speaker:

thinking, you know, we need to get a bus. Should we do it at 10 or

Speaker:

11? I'd like 11. And you go 11

Speaker:

o'clock. You know, the tone of it is more

Speaker:

a, you need to consent to a shared

Speaker:

care arrangement here or we will

Speaker:

apply for full custody and you will lose for these

Speaker:

reasons because you're a liar on these ten things.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: Oh, well, then I'll go for shared custody.

Speaker:

>> Lara: Yeah. And I, you know, I sort of, I laugh because it is that

Speaker:

extreme, you know, and that is the experience

Speaker:

as somebody going through that process.

Speaker:

So if you can imagine, you know, you've been there, right? You

Speaker:

know, if you have, if you've been minutes out

Speaker:

of an abusive relationship, you're not most

Speaker:

resourceful, you know, you're not seeing the

Speaker:

world with clarity. So how many people,

Speaker:

when faced with that and not the funds to have

Speaker:

an aggressive lawyer on the other side, you know,

Speaker:

advocating for them, go, I don't even know what's being

Speaker:

said. Like, I don't even know what you're asking and I don't know the

Speaker:

implications of saying yes or no to it. So I guess

Speaker:

in answer to your question, firstly, I think it's talking about it, but

Speaker:

secondly, I think we have to find

Speaker:

ways to not make, the

Speaker:

legalistic approach to this,

Speaker:

the, the front and centre. You know, it's not, it's

Speaker:

not legal expertise that should be the deciding

Speaker:

factor in determining if a child.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: No. You know, no, no, it shouldn't.

Speaker:

>> Lara: Social workers, it's, it's domestic violence

Speaker:

advocates. So the right voices aren't, the ones in the

Speaker:

room actually influencing these outcomes.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: So were any of those people that you just mentioned, social workers,

Speaker:

domestic violence advocates, etc. Were any of

Speaker:

those people involved in the family court

Speaker:

process and was.

Speaker:

>> Lara: They can be, they can be in different cases. I

Speaker:

personally had support from, a domestic abuse

Speaker:

advocate. But it was less, it, like I said,

Speaker:

they're not a lawyer, so it was less focused on legal process.

Speaker:

It was much more as almost support in

Speaker:

parallel to it.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: Okay, right, so they're supporting you rather than

Speaker:

hired domestic abuse person from the judge.

Speaker:

What is going on here? Right, so

Speaker:

like. Okay, so we need to get that changed.

Speaker:

Okay, like how, how is that even a thing?

Speaker:

Like, how long has this been? How long has this been a thing, the domestic,

Speaker:

the family court? Like probably since

Speaker:

1900.

Speaker:

>> Lara: I don't. Don't even know. But, I don't even

Speaker:

know. But is. And

Speaker:

I, you know, don't profess to have seen

Speaker:

every form of wrongdoing and

Speaker:

corruption. Horrible thing in the country. Right. But of

Speaker:

the things I have experienced, it's the worst thing I've

Speaker:

seen.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: When was family court created?

Speaker:

You're not going to believe it.

Speaker:

2013.

Speaker:

Are you joking? 2013.

Speaker:

The Family Court was created by Part 2 of the Crime

Speaker:

and Courts Act. 2013, merging the

Speaker:

Family Law functions of the county courts and magistrates

Speaker:

courts into one.

Speaker:

Family law was introduced in

Speaker:

1996.

Speaker:

but obviously it's been going on for much further than that. I've

Speaker:

literally, listeners, I've literally just googled when was

Speaker:

family court created? So, and I'm just reading that

Speaker:

page. So

Speaker:

Wikipedia says 2013, when they were

Speaker:

merged. Wikipedia says

Speaker:

Family Law act was 1996,

Speaker:

but then there's dates from 1949.

Speaker:

Wow. Okay, so it's not like

Speaker:

it's old.

Speaker:

right. I. I have no

Speaker:

words. I'm so sorry. I just. I

Speaker:

am, I am shook.

Speaker:

>> Annabelle: Sorry, I.

Speaker:

>> Lara: You.

Speaker:

>> Annabelle: We can cut this out.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: No, go, please.

Speaker:

>> Annabelle: No, I was thinking, Do you know what

Speaker:

really pisses me off? When it's always the

Speaker:

not all men. Men who love to pipe up

Speaker:

and say, oh, you know, like all these

Speaker:

feminists moaning about how unfair life is to them.

Speaker:

But whenever there's a family dispute, the

Speaker:

courts always favour the women. The women always

Speaker:

get all the rights to their kids.

Speaker:

>> Lara: No, fuck off. that's inaccurate and I find it

Speaker:

so frustrating that. Exactly. That is,

Speaker:

if you were to pick a narrative, you know, like, if you were

Speaker:

to go, what's in folklore? What's in like

Speaker:

mainstream media? It would be that. It would be, oh,

Speaker:

don't worry, because they will always favour women. The actual

Speaker:

fact of the matter is that the presumption

Speaker:

the family court work on is that

Speaker:

shared care, so like 50, 50 care is

Speaker:

in the best interest of the child unless there's a

Speaker:

reason for it not to Be and the threshold to

Speaker:

get to that reason not to be. So there might be something really pragmatic,

Speaker:

right? You know, I might live in London

Speaker:

and my ex partner live in Ireland and in which case

Speaker:

they would go shared care is not, not feasible. So

Speaker:

we need to make a decision. But the

Speaker:

threshold to get to that point of going

Speaker:

shared care is not in the interest of the child

Speaker:

is, is like off the charts insane. Like

Speaker:

it's that you know what you need to evidence what

Speaker:

you need to demonstrate so that folklore of

Speaker:

women always get favoured in this system. It's simply

Speaker:

not true. It's simply not the presumption that,

Speaker:

that corporates upon.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: I agree that shared care is

Speaker:

probably the best in situations where it is the

Speaker:

best. Right.

Speaker:

>> Lara: But really if you were in a

Speaker:

functional situation you would have sorted that out

Speaker:

anyway. You would be there, you know. So

Speaker:

if you imagine and this is where my, the biggest frustration, you

Speaker:

know when you say about what needs to shift if you're

Speaker:

in court, no logical, reasonable

Speaker:

person wants to spend their time and money doing that and putting them

Speaker:

right, right. So if you're there,

Speaker:

there's a dysfunction that exists.

Speaker:

So the expertise that's actually needed

Speaker:

in that system is what is that

Speaker:

dysfunction? How do we understand it so

Speaker:

that we can deliver the best outcomes for a child? It's

Speaker:

not a. How can lawyers argue to

Speaker:

win a case for an abuser? But that's not

Speaker:

expertise.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: No, no it's not.

Speaker:

Oh my God, that's so bad. That is so

Speaker:

bad. I'm gonna

Speaker:

try and make it nicer to finish

Speaker:

off.

Speaker:

I like I, I

Speaker:

genuinely had no

Speaker:

idea about that.

Speaker:

We're gonna find some

Speaker:

resources and put them in the show notes

Speaker:

for people who are going through that and they need some

Speaker:

help. Now if you wouldn't mind sharing

Speaker:

afterwards some of the people that

Speaker:

helped you. I'll do some research afterwards and find some

Speaker:

other people and we'll put that in the show notes.

Speaker:

Wowzer. thank you so much for sharing that story Lara.

Speaker:

as you said that was a little while ago. Can

Speaker:

you tell us the outcome

Speaker:

and how things are now?

Speaker:

>> Lara: Yeah, no for sure. So after I think in

Speaker:

total it consumed about three years

Speaker:

of our life. So it consumed three years of her life

Speaker:

and at the end of 2023,

Speaker:

so October 2023 we had a final

Speaker:

hearing. So I decided to

Speaker:

represent myself in the final hearing.

Speaker:

which was brutal. Not going to

Speaker:

lie, you know, I was cross examined by a trained

Speaker:

barrister for the best part of an entire day.

Speaker:

I had to, give evidence in Chief

Speaker:

in terms of putting my case forward myself.

Speaker:

And then you had to conclude with

Speaker:

a, you m. Know, final position. If you know, what is it, what

Speaker:

is it I'm asking for? And why should, why should the

Speaker:

judge, you know, make this ruling? We

Speaker:

were, and I say fortunate. We were fortunate to get the

Speaker:

right outcome. And the right outcome was

Speaker:

that the judge did determine that my ex

Speaker:

partner was not somebody that should be having contact with the

Speaker:

children. the judge did make

Speaker:

specific findings of fact around,

Speaker:

that certain abuse had happened in the past. And it's a

Speaker:

really important part of the process

Speaker:

because one, a finding of fact is made,

Speaker:

it exists forever. So if somebody ever

Speaker:

attempts to take you back to court in the future,

Speaker:

that exists and that will be referred to.

Speaker:

And a fancy, expensive barrister can't

Speaker:

come in and tell you it didn't happen. So it was a really important

Speaker:

outcome to get that in writing from a

Speaker:

judge. unfortunately what happens when you

Speaker:

get a final outcome is that people can appeal.

Speaker:

And this is a really like, challenging part of the

Speaker:

process that again, probably isn't so well

Speaker:

known. Somebody can make an application to Family Court

Speaker:

every month of the week if they want, you know, every month of the year if they

Speaker:

want. So if you are dealing with an abusive

Speaker:

partner, they're going to do that for somebody

Speaker:

to do an application and do another one, get an outcome and appeal

Speaker:

it. So my, ex partner did appeal.

Speaker:

that hung over us for the best part of another

Speaker:

year. So it was scheduled to be heard

Speaker:

in August of this year. he had

Speaker:

gone radio silent, like in the intervening period.

Speaker:

So I know his movements. I dealt with him for so long

Speaker:

and I think when you've dealt with someone where you have to be highly

Speaker:

vigilant, you get quite good at sort of reading them and

Speaker:

what they do and how they do it. so I assumed he was

Speaker:

not going to turn up to the appeal. But the really

Speaker:

frustrating thing is even knowing that, I

Speaker:

still have to prepare for it and I still have to allocate time to it

Speaker:

and I still have to turn up. So I did turn up

Speaker:

and he didn't and the judge therefore

Speaker:

dismissed it. There is a particular order

Speaker:

you can apply for which is

Speaker:

there to mitigate abusive people abusing the

Speaker:

system, which is to go like, it's in

Speaker:

effect, not giving them the right to make further

Speaker:

applications. And I requested that from the judge.

Speaker:

Unfortunately, that was not, that was not granted.

Speaker:

but we are now at the stage where we

Speaker:

have you know, since. Since the final hearing in

Speaker:

2023, we've lived happily as a family. The boys

Speaker:

love their younger sister. They're thriving in

Speaker:

school. they are doing, you know, they're

Speaker:

brilliant hobbies outside of school. So they're both like, really into

Speaker:

basketball. They're amazing at it. They're doing well

Speaker:

academically. I made the decision at

Speaker:

the start of 2024, to work

Speaker:

independently. And a big move for

Speaker:

me because I feel that even though I hadn't been

Speaker:

in that relationship the whole time, almost the

Speaker:

stability of being in a corporate and the things that come

Speaker:

around from that, you know, because you, you get a

Speaker:

monthly salary and you get all of your benefits and you've got that

Speaker:

security. I felt for the first time that I was

Speaker:

in a position to actually sort of like, follow my passion and go, do

Speaker:

you know what? I've always wanted to work for myself and now I can.

Speaker:

so it is, it's a really good news

Speaker:

story as an outcome. We never should have had to live

Speaker:

through it and we certainly shouldn't have had to live through

Speaker:

it to the, just the

Speaker:

horrendous treatment that we did. but

Speaker:

I'll forever be grateful for the outcome we got. And

Speaker:

I'd always try to look back on moments and go, look,

Speaker:

if you can take the learning from anything, then it's not a

Speaker:

wasted experience. And there's so much to

Speaker:

learn. Like, if I had not experienced

Speaker:

this, I wouldn't know it existed because it is private,

Speaker:

it is secret, it is sealed. And I am a

Speaker:

very resourceful person. So I'm not a

Speaker:

good person to know about this.

Speaker:

I'm not a good person to know about it because I can't unsee it and

Speaker:

I won't unsee it. And I don't have the grand

Speaker:

plan yet. But, you know, I think I mentioned to you in

Speaker:

passing, Wendy, I was at the beginning of the year,

Speaker:

I always sit down and write intentions. And I try

Speaker:

to do it without sort of the shoulds, the woods. What do other people

Speaker:

expect from me? And I've got, I've got obviously my own, like,

Speaker:

professional Pursuits. but at the top of the page

Speaker:

I wrote blow up the family court system

Speaker:

because it is so wrong and it is so

Speaker:

abusive and almost no one knows about it. And

Speaker:

everyone should. And I think if you

Speaker:

describe the ins and outs of it to any reasonable

Speaker:

person, there isn't anyone, that would say that

Speaker:

that is how it should function.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: I'm in awe of you

Speaker:

for coming on and Talking about it. Thank

Speaker:

you so much for sharing your experience,

Speaker:

for putting that on your

Speaker:

intentions at the top. Like, we

Speaker:

can't do it, like, supporting, sticking up

Speaker:

for, speaking for. Because I

Speaker:

think also, like, a lot of people,

Speaker:

like, we don't talk about abuse the

Speaker:

where we should. I'm sure. I'm

Speaker:

guessing that people don't want to talk about the fact that

Speaker:

they've had to go to family court and potentially lost

Speaker:

their child.

Speaker:

>> Lara: And people like that. People do. That's the thing that people.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: Yeah. Like, I think it's.

Speaker:

People don't even. Like, if, If a social worker comes to

Speaker:

your house when you've got a child, you don't want to tell anybody

Speaker:

that because then they're going to think that you're a bad parent.

Speaker:

So. So thank you so much for

Speaker:

talking about it. As

Speaker:

I said, we're going to put some resources in the show

Speaker:

notes and

Speaker:

yes, amazing that your

Speaker:

story and your family are living

Speaker:

together beautifully now and I'm so

Speaker:

happy for you. But, yeah, just,

Speaker:

I am thinking about those that aren't.

Speaker:

>> Lara: You know, you mentioned about some of the support. I attended

Speaker:

a programme as I was going through and it was all done remotely

Speaker:

because it was that period of COVID where you couldn't meet anyone in

Speaker:

person. but there was a programme

Speaker:

called Me and you, Mum, I think it

Speaker:

was called, and I believe Women's Aid.

Speaker:

Women's Aid created it, but it's delivered

Speaker:

via lots of local domestic abuse charities

Speaker:

as well. often with domestic abuse

Speaker:

support. Women's Aid is like the big sort of strap

Speaker:

line, but actually a lot of provision happens locally

Speaker:

from sort of like local charities that are, you know, sort

Speaker:

of associated with. With Women's Aid. and I

Speaker:

just never forget being in that little support group and

Speaker:

feeling like I was at the lowest ebb, but then

Speaker:

hearing other people's experiences that just didn't have some

Speaker:

of the resources I had. And we did, like, the last

Speaker:

session, I think it was like 10 weeks. And one of the women

Speaker:

on it, because we were all sort of doing this. This is what I got from it and

Speaker:

thank you and goodbye. And she said,

Speaker:

I'm really going to miss attending this

Speaker:

because you are the only people I speak to all week,

Speaker:

apart from my daughter. And, you know when you're just like, I'm done,

Speaker:

but I don't, like, I don't even know where to go because

Speaker:

I'm feeling the way I'm feeling and I'm about to

Speaker:

step out of this room to my partner and I can pick up

Speaker:

the phone to my dad or my mom or my friends and I've got a

Speaker:

job and I've got, you know, I've got all of these sort of

Speaker:

tentacles in different parts of life

Speaker:

that keep me, like, afloat

Speaker:

and I can't. And I know it sounds awful, but you know when

Speaker:

you're like one of a group of 12 and I'm like, I barely remember

Speaker:

your name yet you're saying people you speak

Speaker:

to, like in the, week, and it just gave you that

Speaker:

sense of the. The loneliness

Speaker:

of people going through, but some of those processes

Speaker:

and the lack of support and even like the

Speaker:

step to reach out and be on that programme in the

Speaker:

first place. And I was like, my goodness, there is always

Speaker:

someone worse off. Like, always someone worse off.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: like, I don't. I wish I could change it now with

Speaker:

just like a wave of a magic wand.

Speaker:

>> Lara: One day I would love for there to

Speaker:

be, an app to

Speaker:

help you do the family call system, you know, so

Speaker:

like, even down to the grounds of like.

Speaker:

So as an example, I attend a hearing

Speaker:

and if you want special measures in a hearing, and what

Speaker:

special measures might be is I want to attend

Speaker:

remotely because I don't want to be in the same room as my abuser

Speaker:

or if I am in the same room, I want there to be a screen

Speaker:

or I need a separate waiting room or separate

Speaker:

entrances. There's a form you need to fill in to do that. You

Speaker:

can't just ask and then no form is called

Speaker:

special measures. You know, it's called EX

Speaker:

1293 ABC. Like, whatever, you know, like, as

Speaker:

in even down to the basics of something

Speaker:

as stupid and just should just

Speaker:

happen for you. But you should just be able to send an

Speaker:

email going, here are my special requirements

Speaker:

and this is what I will be doing. Now. You have to know

Speaker:

the form. You have to fill in a form, you have to send it in. You have

Speaker:

to get the judge's permission for that to happen. The

Speaker:

judge doesn't read anything on the police file until three

Speaker:

minutes before. So you're left, like in waiting to really

Speaker:

anxious going, do I need to attend in person or

Speaker:

not? Because, you know, and all of the

Speaker:

arrangements you'd make around that if you were in the room with somebody

Speaker:

that's beaten or raped or whatever they've done, to you, and

Speaker:

you don't know, like, if you need to be in the same room

Speaker:

as them or if you're going to be protected. It's

Speaker:

obscene. And it's another little thing but it's like a

Speaker:

microcosm of the system, you know, like at every

Speaker:

coin, it's that exclusive.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: What about if somebody's got a disability or

Speaker:

neurodivergent or.

Speaker:

>> Lara: I've never really even got asked those questions. I don't think I

Speaker:

was in family court one day. I was sitting in the waiting

Speaker:

room. like, honestly, I've been to more court hearings than

Speaker:

most lawyers by this stage. Like, genuinely, I think I've spent more time in

Speaker:

court than them. Like, most lawyers. Lawyers don't actually end up

Speaker:

in court because they're not barristers. So I genuinely

Speaker:

think I've more experience court than the majority of

Speaker:

solicitors that you'd speak to. Right. Which is

Speaker:

obscene. I was sitting in a

Speaker:

waiting room waiting for my hearing to

Speaker:

happen. First of all, what happened was security

Speaker:

run through the building, like, sprinted through, and

Speaker:

they run to a courtroom that was in hearing. Next

Speaker:

thing, they come out with this really big, you know, like, really

Speaker:

stereotypical. But if you imagine, like,

Speaker:

Easter drinker, bald head, you know, like, come out

Speaker:

as really stereotypical. You know, guy, two

Speaker:

security guards, and he's. I don't give a fuck. Anyway,

Speaker:

all of this. And then the lady that had been,

Speaker:

I guess the ex partner comes out really shaken with

Speaker:

her barrister. They go in a room. I'm

Speaker:

seeing all of this play out live. The judges

Speaker:

obviously said, this man can't go anywhere near the children for now

Speaker:

or whatever's happened. I get home later that

Speaker:

day and there was a news story that he's abducted the

Speaker:

child. So even when you

Speaker:

are in the system and you're doing the right

Speaker:

thing and you get in so many, so much I can do, you

Speaker:

know, like, if you're dealing with the lunatic, you're dealing with a lunatic,

Speaker:

you're not safe.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: Yep, yep.

Speaker:

>> Lara: And because he's got parental responsibility and

Speaker:

that's the key thing, you've got parental

Speaker:

responsibility. I can in. In

Speaker:

theory, if you're, you know, child is under

Speaker:

16, you've got parental responsibility. Father

Speaker:

can just take them and no one will

Speaker:

intervene without a court order. And it might take

Speaker:

you a year, two years

Speaker:

to get a court order. What? Depending

Speaker:

on how complex it's made.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: We like to ask a question at the end of every

Speaker:

podcast. Can you tell us one

Speaker:

piece of clothing or an outfit or something

Speaker:

like that that makes you feel your most

Speaker:

powerful or beautiful in.

Speaker:

>> Lara: Do you know what? I can. I actually can. And I

Speaker:

was laughing when you mentioned this earlier because initially

Speaker:

I had no idea. And then I was like, I'VE got it.

Speaker:

I have this, oversized,

Speaker:

like three quarter length bright,

Speaker:

yellowy mustard coat. And I

Speaker:

love it because you can throw it on over anything. You know, it's oversized,

Speaker:

so it doesn't matter what outfit. You can go smart, you can go

Speaker:

casual. But the reason it makes me

Speaker:

feel brilliant and powerful is I can't even

Speaker:

remember who said it to me. They're so obviously irrelevant in my

Speaker:

life. It was one point that I was wearing

Speaker:

a mustard dress to work and a

Speaker:

conversation started and someone in the group

Speaker:

said, no one can pull off mustard as I was

Speaker:

wearing. So from m.

Speaker:

That moment forward, I don't even think mustard used

Speaker:

to be like a favourite colour of mine. But from that moment forward,

Speaker:

I was like, I will wear mustard at every

Speaker:

opportunity. And I channel

Speaker:

that. Anytime I put my mustard coat on, I'm like, really?

Speaker:

No one can wear mustard. Plenty of compliments,

Speaker:

thank you very much.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: I love that. Don't fucking tell me what to wear or how

Speaker:

to run my business.

Speaker:

>> Lara: So I need to remember the person. But you know, sadly, I think

Speaker:

it was definitely a woman. It was a woman because it was,

Speaker:

And they said it as I was wearing it and I was like,

Speaker:

really? You watch

Speaker:

me in my mustard.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: That's bitchy. That is. That's pure

Speaker:

bitchy. Like

Speaker:

slut. No, don't. No. Violence is not the

Speaker:

answer.

Speaker:

>> Lara: Dying a three quarter oversized cooties.

Speaker:

Wendy, do you

Speaker:

know what?

Speaker:

>> Annabelle: You can so tell that that is your

Speaker:

favourite piece or that that is such a key item

Speaker:

for you? Because Wendy, did you notice Lara's

Speaker:

entire physicality and body language

Speaker:

and facial expression and everything just

Speaker:

did. As you started talking about the magical mustard

Speaker:

coat.

Speaker:

>> Lara: I could be wearing my pyjamas underneath and I'm

Speaker:

strutting in my mustard coat.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: Magical mustard coat.

Speaker:

Laura, thank you so much for coming on. You're such a

Speaker:

gem.

Speaker:

>> Lara: You are so welcome. Really appreciate you inviting

Speaker:

me.

Speaker:

>> Annabelle: That was

Speaker:

epically good.

Speaker:

>> Wo0: I'm like literally holding tears back.

Speaker:

That's it for today's episode of Don't Tell Me what to Wear

Speaker:

or How to Run My Business. On the Woopod with me, Wendy

Speaker:

Gannon. This is more than just a podcast. It's part

Speaker:

of female 5 million. Head to the link in the show notes

Speaker:

to find out more about our movement to empower women.

Speaker:

If this episode spoke to you in any way, made you laugh,

Speaker:

made you cry, or maybe inspired you, share

Speaker:

it with a friend who needs to hear it. Leave us a rating and a

Speaker:

review and let's keep this movement growing.

Speaker:

And while I've got you here. My photography is the way that

Speaker:

I fight back against the patriarchy. I empower

Speaker:

female founders with the confidence to be themselves in their business,

Speaker:

to really enjoy their photo shoot and actually

Speaker:

love their photos so then they can grow their

Speaker:

business, increase their prices and get paid what they fucking

Speaker:

deserve. If you want to work with me, drop me

Speaker:

a message. All the info you need to contact me is in the show

Speaker:

notes. Until next time, keep doing you

Speaker:

and remember, you are part of something bigger.

Speaker:

Bye.

Show artwork for wo0 pod

About the Podcast

wo0 pod
Don't f**king tell me what to wear or how to run my business
Welcome to "Don't F*king Tell Me What to Wear or How to Run My Business" on the wo0 pod - a brand new, zero bullsh*t podcast from Wendy Gannon (aka 'wo0'). This podcast is part of the Female Five Million movement, empowering women to step up, take control, and unapologetically own their space.
This podcast is for women who are done with being told how to act, dress, or run their businesses (and lives). Wendy, a professional photographer with nearly two decades of experience, brings you real, unfiltered conversations with women who've lived through and overcome sexism, abuse, and everything the patriarchy has thrown at them. Expect inspiring guests, women championing women, a LOT of swearing (too many for producer Buckers to bother censoring!) and most importantly, stories that will make you laugh and cry in equal measure.
Subscribe now and join the movement—because we will wear what the f*ck we want, we will say what the f*ck we want, and we will run our f*cking businesses the way we f*cking want.

Wendy Gannon:
wo0 photography: https://www.wo0.co.uk/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/wo0photography/
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/wo0photography/

This is an original podcast from Decibelle Creative: https://www.decibellecreative.com/